Acute and Critical Care

Young Jae Cho

2 Articles

Quality Improvement
Successful Implementation of a Rapid Response System in the Department of Internal Medicine: Yeon Joo Lee, Jin Joo Park, Yeonyee E Yoon, Jin Won Kim, Jong Sun Park, Taeyun Kim, Jae Hyuk Lee, Jung Won Suh, You Hwan Jo, Sangheon Park, Kyuseok Kim, Young Jae Cho; Korean J Crit Care Med. 2014;29(2):77-82. Published online May 31, 2014; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/kjccm.2014.29.2.77

6,035 View
104 Download
5 Crossref

Background
A rapid response system (RRS) aims to prevent unexpected patient death due to clinical errors and is becoming an essential part of intensive care. We examined the activity and outcomes of RRS for patients admitted to our institution’s department of internal medicine.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed patients detected by the RRS and admitted to the medical intensive care unit (MICU) from October 2012 through August 2013. We studied the overall activity of the RRS and compared patient outcomes between those admitted via the RRS and those admitted conventionally.
Results
A total of 4,849 alert lists were generated from 2,505 medical service patients. The RRS was activated in 58 patients: A (Admit to ICU), B (Borderline intervention), C (Consultation), and D (Do not resuscitate) in 26 (44.8%), 21 (36.2%), 4 (6.9%), and 7 (12.1%) patients, respectively. Low oxygen saturation was the most common criterion for RRS activation. MICU admission via the RRS resulted in a shorter ICU stay than that via conventional admission (6.2 vs. 9.9 days, p = 0.018).
Conclusions
An RRS can be successfully implemented in medical services. ICU admission via the RRS resulted in a shorter ICU stay than that via conventional admission. Further study is required to determine long-term outcomes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Characteristics and Prognosis of Hospitalized Patients at High Risk of Deterioration Identified by the Rapid Response System: a Multicenter Cohort Study
Sang Hyuk Kim, Ji Young Hong, Youlim Kim
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Effects of a Rapid Response Team on the Clinical Outcomes of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation of Patients Hospitalized in General Wards
Mi-Jung Yoon, Jin-Hee Park
Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing.2021; 28(4): 491. CrossRef
Rapid response systems in Korea
Bo Young Lee, Sang-Bum Hong
Acute and Critical Care.2019; 34(2): 108. CrossRef
Effect of a rapid response system on code rates and in-hospital mortality in medical wards
Hong Yeul Lee, Jinwoo Lee, Sang-Min Lee, Sulhee Kim, Eunjin Yang, Hyun Joo Lee, Hannah Lee, Ho Geol Ryu, Seung-Young Oh, Eun Jin Ha, Sang-Bae Ko, Jaeyoung Cho
Acute and Critical Care.2019; 34(4): 246. CrossRef
Differences in the Clinical Characteristics of Rapid Response System Activation in Patients Admitted to Medical or Surgical Services
Yeon Joo Lee, Dong Seon Lee, Hyunju Min, Yun Young Choi, Eun Young Lee, Inae Song, Yeonyee E. Yoon, Jin Won Kim, Jong Sun Park, Young-Jae Cho, Jae Hyuk Lee, Jung-Won Suh, You Hwan, Kyuseok Kim, Sangheon Park
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2017; 32(4): 688. CrossRef

Thoracic Surgery
A Closed-Suction Catheter with a Pressure Valve Can Reduce Tracheal Mucosal Injury in Intubated Patients: Jin Heon Jeong, Sung Jin Nam, Young Jae Cho, Yeon Joo Lee, Se Joong Kim, In Ae Song, Sang Heon Park, Young Tae Jeon; Korean J Crit Care Med. 2014;29(1):7-12. Published online February 28, 2014; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/kjccm.2014.29.1.7

7,357 View
159 Download
2 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Background
Endotracheal suctioning is associated with complications that include bleeding, infection, hypoxemia, cardiovascular instability, and tracheal mucosal injury. Recently, a closed-suction catheter with a pressure valve (Acetrachcare, AceMedical Co., Republic of Korea) was developed. We hypothesized that this new catheter might reduce tracheal mucosal injury compared to a conventional closed-suction catheter (Trachcare, Kimberly-balla RD, USA).
Methods
This prospective, randomized study enrolled medical and surgical patients who required mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours. Patients were randomized into two groups: one group was suctioned with the conventional closed-suction catheter (CCC) and the other group was suctioned with the closed-suction catheter with pressure valve (CCPV). Bronchoscopy was performed 48 hours later, and the severity of tracheal mucosal injury was graded on a 5-point scale, as follows: 0 = normal; 1 = erythema or edema; 2 = erosion; 3 = hemorrhage; and 4 = ulceration or necrosis.
Results
A total of 76 patients (37 with CCPV and 39 with CCC) were included. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding demographic characteristics, changes in hemodynamic parameters during suction, incidence of pneumonia, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, or ICU mortality. On bronchoscopic evaluation, the use of the CCPV led to a significant decrease in tracheal mucosal injury (median tracheal mucosal injury grade 1 [IQR 0-1] vs. 2 [IQR 1-3], p = 0.001).
Conclusions
We conclude that the novel closed-suction catheter with pressure valve may reduce tracheal mucosal injury compared to conventional catheters.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

“Study on Device System to Reduce Tracheal Mucosal Injury in Intubation Patients” [ASME Journal of Medical Devices, 2022, 16(3), p. 031006; DOI: 10.1115/1.4054334]

Journal of Medical Devices.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Efficacy of the Closed Suction Applied To Patients In Intensive Care Units with Different Techniques: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial
Zuhal GÜLSOY, Şerife KARAGÖZOĞLU
Cumhuriyet Medical Journal.2020;[Epub] CrossRef

Author index